My view of creative non-fiction has expanded since the beginning of the semester in that I have learned about different fashions in which it can be written. I have certainly given more thought to the use of humor and sentimentality in my writing of both fiction and non-fiction, as well as the possible value of experimentation within these forms.
Reading the work of other creative non-fiction writers and learning more about creative non-fiction has definitely reminded me to keep a distance between myself and my writing. For years I have enjoyed reading and writing both poetry and fiction, but creative non-fiction is not a medium I can claim a total familiarity of. That being the case, the course has allowed me to sample a form of writing which I might not have otherwise examined so closely. I plan, for instance, to purchase Dave Sedaris's Me Talk Pretty One Day, a book I have seen on the shelf at Target for years but never knew enough about to examine further.
The blog assignments have forced me to think about the learning process I undergo throughout the semester, thus making the course more productive. The questions prompt me (hence the name "prompts," I suppose) to give thought to my work and guide me in thinking about how to improve it. The blog assignments will probably prove most beneficial when the time comes to revise work for my final portfolio.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Friday, November 5, 2010
A Memoir of My Basement
"For all I know I was conceived in my basement; I know my older brother was. My mother made us privy to this while we were out at dinner once with her and her old friends. I was raised in the home of my paternal grandmother, and my parents have been divorced for almost twenty years, so my mother hasn't seen the basement in which she conceived her children in a long time. 'Do you still got that pool table down there?' my mom's friend Joey asked me. I told him we did and that's when my mother matter-of-factly mentioned that my brother was conceived atop it."
I have lived my entire life in the same house and thus have spent much time in my basement (I am there right now), so writing about seems fitting.
I don't believe I have to explain anything about the piece. It should speak for itself if it was effective. I think that if I have to relate anything to the readers about the piece then there is revision to be done.
I cannot cite any outside inspiration for this piece other than the characters who are a part of it.
This piece does not feel complete even to me, so I could understand a reader critisizing it as such. Some coherence will be my main focus in revision.
Although the piece was about a particular place, I found the setting and the characters inseperable. Setting only finds importance by the characters who move through it.
I have lived my entire life in the same house and thus have spent much time in my basement (I am there right now), so writing about seems fitting.
I don't believe I have to explain anything about the piece. It should speak for itself if it was effective. I think that if I have to relate anything to the readers about the piece then there is revision to be done.
I cannot cite any outside inspiration for this piece other than the characters who are a part of it.
This piece does not feel complete even to me, so I could understand a reader critisizing it as such. Some coherence will be my main focus in revision.
Although the piece was about a particular place, I found the setting and the characters inseperable. Setting only finds importance by the characters who move through it.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Response to "Abracadabra"
Three sentences I found particularly poignant in Solwitz's memoir read as follows: "If the soul lives even ten seconds after death, [Jesse] had to have heard me" (673); "[Jesse] and Seth walking together along the sidewalk, bumping into each other, not as a dominance game but as an unconscoius joining, a return to their junction in utero" (674); and "But I fear madness without my audience, my readers, however imaginary" (676). Solwitz's writing style has its strength in her honesty--as when she blatantly acknowledges that she is in dire need of her readers--but its weakness is when she leans toward sentimentality. The death of her son is a perfectly morose subject on its own and needs no embellishment.
The character Solwitz develops for herself in her memoir is nothing out of the orndinary for a person experiencing the loss that she has: she is hostile toward others who remind her of her son, capricious in her personality, and neurotic. She captivates readers with flashes of creative experimentation and the humanity of her self-contradictions. She offers herself advice only to repudiate it in passages to come.
I imagine Solwitz published this memoir because she took her own advice: write for yourself. Readers are drawn to her piece's consistency throughout, knowing that her pain will not be assuaged but that she might grow from it. In this respect, this is more a memoir concerning Solwitz herself than her deceased son Jesse. He is the person to whom the piece is dedicated, but she is the one moving the piece forward in her constant attempts to recover from her tragedy.
The character Solwitz develops for herself in her memoir is nothing out of the orndinary for a person experiencing the loss that she has: she is hostile toward others who remind her of her son, capricious in her personality, and neurotic. She captivates readers with flashes of creative experimentation and the humanity of her self-contradictions. She offers herself advice only to repudiate it in passages to come.
I imagine Solwitz published this memoir because she took her own advice: write for yourself. Readers are drawn to her piece's consistency throughout, knowing that her pain will not be assuaged but that she might grow from it. In this respect, this is more a memoir concerning Solwitz herself than her deceased son Jesse. He is the person to whom the piece is dedicated, but she is the one moving the piece forward in her constant attempts to recover from her tragedy.
Cameras, Shovels, and Horses
I am looking at a century-old photograph by Prokudin-Gorskii which depicts villagers, in what appears to be a mountainous Russian town, shoveling something into the backs of their horse-drawn carriages. Each of the two carriages in the photo are pulled by only one horse apiece, perhaps all the villagers could afford. An elderly woman sits atop her carriage in the foreground while a man donning a gray hat has his shovel plunged in something brown behind her, ready to fill the carriage. The gray hat is in style, perhaps a gift from a Siberian relative who came to visit months ago. A teenaged girl sits on the ground beside the old woman's carriage with a basket in front of her, not caring that her clothes are dusted with earth.
In the background stands another person weilding a shovel but the blurriness in his/her face makes his/her gender indistiguishable.
All four people are looking directly at the camera. This might be the first time one has ever come into their presence and it makes them a bit nervous and a bit mesmerized at the same time. They are on the cusp of a technological breakthrough. They are photogenic peasants.
In the background stands another person weilding a shovel but the blurriness in his/her face makes his/her gender indistiguishable.
All four people are looking directly at the camera. This might be the first time one has ever come into their presence and it makes them a bit nervous and a bit mesmerized at the same time. They are on the cusp of a technological breakthrough. They are photogenic peasants.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)